Older adults age at different rates and need different technology at various stages.
2025 scheduling underway.
When firms collapse noisily, peers notice. Last week several firms commented (anonymously and by name) on the failure of Lively, a sensor-based home monitoring hub that tried too late to pivot into the PERS industry. Why do startups fail, anyway? In this industry, it appears more often than not that the founders believed they were different from the other players in the market (Lifecomm or AtGuardianAngel); that consumers would shop in BestBuy for an unfamiliar category (Wellcore); that a celebrity would make a big difference (Floh Club).
But some companies have staying power. They meet a need, craft a memorable brand, they figure out the best way to go to market through a catalog, they find a partner (Posit Science and AAA), they stick to the mission (AARP TEK). These are just examples – many more stay, with websites that feature older adults. Also staying: their boards of directors, external partners, and even their installed base. Text is from the companies’ websites – linked in the title of each paragraph. And of course, through comments, other suggestions of firms with multi-year staying power are welcome:
Comments
Staying power
An interesting read, Laurie. According to a study that was mentioned on Senior Housing News -- it found that few seniors use age in place technology. The most used are PERS, which makes sense. The rest have low percentages of users. Do you know if that's true? If so, do you know of a survey (of users) illustrating the usage of different technologies?
That study was on Caring.com
The study you mention came from Caring.com.
https://seniorhousingnews.com/2015/11/19/where-is-the-steve-jobs-of-senior-care-tech/
I don't have a profile handy of the Caring.com user, but I am willing to bet that the primary user is a caregiver, not a senior.
The last study on usage of aging in place technology was most likely the studies fielded by Linkage (2011 and 2012). Prior to that was the AARP Healthy@Home 2.0 from 2011.
The penetration of PERS in at least one of those was around 15%.
Otherwise usage is likely lower that 15%, often explained by 'lack of awareness'. I doubt that -- more likely seniors resist technologies that are primarily offered for the benefit of their adult children. See Lively.
jobs working with seniors and technology
I'm an occupational therapist in Virginia looking for employment in the aging in place with technology field. Any suggestions on companies on the east coast looking to employ therapists who have worked with seniors in a variety of settings to help develop technology or train seniors?
jobs working with seniors and technology
Tammy, check out Vitality Fitness and Wellness Maryland (on FB). It is my friend, Peter Francis' company and they specialize in personal training for seniors. He may be able to point you in a good direction. Best regards, Chris
Interesting
Interesting post, Laurie. Long-term success in aging tech appears to depend on understanding senior needs, staying mission-focused, and providing genuine value. Adaptation and strong partnerships also play a crucial role in sustaining these companies.